<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FAQs of Life</title>
	<link>http://faqsoflife.net</link>
	<description>The Answers I give to the Questions I'm asked the most</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Issue with Windows Updates after installing XP SP3</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/07/15/issue-with-windows-updates-after-installing-xp-sp3/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/07/15/issue-with-windows-updates-after-installing-xp-sp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Tech Tips/Fixes</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/07/15/issue-with-windows-updates-after-installing-xp-sp3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve encountered an issue recently on a few machines with Windows Update on Windows XP machines after installing Service Pack 3 on them.  Essentially, the updates get downloaded but not installed.
There are a ton of various fixes for Windows Updates but this patch from Microsoft  resloves this particular issue with minimal headache.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943144/en-us#
Follow the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve encountered an issue recently on a few machines with Windows Update on Windows XP machines after installing Service Pack 3 on them.  Essentially, the updates get downloaded but not installed.</p>
<p>There are a ton of various fixes for Windows Updates but this patch from Microsoft  resloves this particular issue with minimal headache.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943144/en-us#">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/943144/en-us#</a></p>
<p>Follow the instructions for Method 2.</p>
<ul>
<li>Save the x86 version (very few folks are running XP 64) to the <strong>root of your C: drive (very important to save to an easily accessible location)</strong>.</li>
<li>Click on Start | Run and enter <strong>C:\WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe /wuforce</strong></li>
<li>Follow the prompts to install the update</li>
<li>Run Windows Updates</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/07/15/issue-with-windows-updates-after-installing-xp-sp3/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yet another Outlook issue: Sending 1 of &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/06/04/yet-another-outlook-issue-sending-1-of/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/06/04/yet-another-outlook-issue-sending-1-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 18:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Tech Tips/Fixes</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/06/04/yet-another-outlook-issue-sending-1-of/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Came across an Outlook 2003 issue today that I&#8217;ve only seen one previous time. Basically, Outlook functions normally but in the right corner of the status bar, it lists sending 1 of x number of messages. However, there are no messages in the outbox.  If you see this you probably have some &#8220;Read Receipts&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across an Outlook 2003 issue today that I&#8217;ve only seen one previous time. Basically, Outlook functions normally but in the right corner of the status bar, it lists sending 1 of x number of messages. However, there are no messages in the outbox.  If you see this you probably have some &#8220;Read Receipts&#8221; that are trying to be sent.</p>
<p>The resolution isn&#8217;t for the faint of heart but it really isn&#8217;t complicated.  You have to download <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3D1C7482-4C6E-4EC5-983E-127100D71376">MDBVU32.EXE</a> from Microsoft which allows you to delete items from the Outlook data store (PST file) that you cannot see in the Outlook client.<br />
<a href="http://www.howto-outlook.com/">How-to-Outlook</a> has a <a href="http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/deletereadreceipt.htm">great tutorial on the process</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/06/04/yet-another-outlook-issue-sending-1-of/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outlook 2007 Bug when setting up a new user</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/05/05/outlook-2007-bug-when-setting-up-a-new-user/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/05/05/outlook-2007-bug-when-setting-up-a-new-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Tech Tips/Fixes</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/05/05/outlook-2007-bug-when-setting-up-a-new-user/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s a problem that I encountered for the second time in recent weeks. Thought I’d pass it along, hopefully saving some frustration…
Here the scenario:
New user/profile setup on computer where Office 2007 was installed using a different profile.  New Local user has full admin rights to local machine.
After configuring Outlook 2007 for a new user on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Here’s a problem that I encountered for the second time in recent weeks. Thought I’d pass it along, hopefully saving some frustration…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Here the scenario:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">New user/profile setup on computer where Office 2007 was installed using a different profile.  New Local user has full admin rights to local machine.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">After configuring Outlook 2007 for a new user on a machine, Outlook won’t close using File Exit or click on the X. Also, if you opened a message to read it, you could not close that window. I had to use task manager and end the process.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On subsequent attempt to use  Outlook 2007, the mail configuration settings are retained. The prompt to enter your Name and Initials pops up but quickly disappears before you can enter the information.  Still have to use task manager to end process.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">The first time I encountered the problem, I did a bit of Google research and found that the trick to fixing this was to open Word or Excel 2007 (with Outlook closed) and set the user info it asks for.  Somehow, this fixes the problem of Outlook 2007 from closing…  When I came across it the second time today, I had forgot the problems from a couple weeks ago (different companies) but alas it was the same issue.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">At least one of the machines was running Office 2007 Service Pack 1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/05/05/outlook-2007-bug-when-setting-up-a-new-user/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where did all of my Outlook addresses/contacts go?</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/04/17/where-did-all-of-my-outlook-addressescontacts-go/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/04/17/where-did-all-of-my-outlook-addressescontacts-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 01:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Computer Questions</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/04/17/where-did-all-of-my-outlook-addressescontacts-go/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the features that I get a lot of questions is about the Outlook 2003 (and 2007) auto complete function and it&#8217;s relation, or lack there of, to Outlook Contacts.  Anyone that has used Outlook for any length of time knows what I&#8217;m talking about; when you open a new email and start [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the features that I get a lot of questions is about the Outlook 2003 (and 2007) auto complete function and it&#8217;s relation, or lack there of, to Outlook Contacts.  Anyone that has used Outlook for any length of time knows what I&#8217;m talking about; when you open a new email and start typing an address and you get a list of addresses to pick from.  If an address does not AutoComplete, it will be added to the list and show up the next time you start typing that address.  This is a terrific function and the majority of Outlook users - myself included - continually use this feature.</p>
<p>Outlook Contacts are used to store email addresses, multiple phone numbers and mailing address, and just about any other piece of info that you could associate with a person or company.  Once you have an email address listed for a contact, you can easily use your &#8220;Address Book&#8221; to pick users and send messages without retyping their address.  There is no link between email addresses that exist as Contacts or email addresses that are stored in your AutoComplete list.  If you update an email address for a person in your Contacts, there is a very high probability that the old address exists in the AutoComplete list, making it far too easy to send a message to an old address even after you&#8217;ve updated it in your contacts.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the problem with AutoComplete (also called Nickname file)?  There are three specific problems that I&#8217;ve encountered with this feature.</p>
<ol>
<li>The AutoComplete information is kept in a file, separate from the rest of your Outlook information. It&#8217;s difficult to transfer the AutoComplete list to a new computer</li>
<li>If you&#8217;re not careful, you can easily send a message to the wrong person</li>
<li>Removing entries from the list is not intuitive.</li>
</ol>
<p>The first issue is the biggest problem - the AutoComplete file is not kept in the same place as your Outlook information.  If you work in a company and have a dedicated email server, any information you have stored in Outlook is most likely backed-up on a regular basis. Except for the AutoComplete file.  This file isn&#8217;t stored on your company&#8217;s email server but in your user profile on your local computer. In Windows XP, this file is stored in C:\Documents and Settings\<em>username</em>\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\<strong><em>profilename</em></strong>.<strong>NK2</strong>.  (Replace username with your username and profile name with the Outlook profile display name, this is often just &#8220;Outlook&#8221;).  And if you use Outlook with a local PST file, hopefully you&#8217;re backing up your PST file.  (If you&#8217;re not take a look at <a title="Mozy Backup" target="_blank" href="http://www.mozy.com">Mozy online backup</a>).  But the .NK2 file is stored in a completely different location than the PST file.</p>
<p>Since this file is not stored with the rest of your Outlook data, not only do you have to be diligent in backing the file up, you also have to manually move it if you get a new computer, regardless if you are using an email server or use a PST file.  The basic procedure for moving the AutoComplete is copy the file from C:\Documents and Settings\<em>username</em>\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\<strong><em>profilename</em></strong>.<strong>NK2 </strong>and put it into the same location on the new computer.  If the Outlook profile name is different on the new computer, rename the NK2 file to match.</p>
<p>The second issue is that while very convenient, the AutoComplete feature makes it VERY easy to misaddress emails.  If you don&#8217;t pay attention, it&#8217;s very easy to send the salary reports to Steve the assistant rather than Steven the CFO.  Just last night one of my clients sent me an email intended for someone else because she didn&#8217;t check the address that the AutoComplete filled in.<br />
Building on the second problem, there are very limited options if you want to edit the AutoComplete file.  There&#8217;s no built in way to edit an entry and deleting entries isn&#8217;t clear either.  Here&#8217;s the steps for deleting a AutoComplete address</p>
<ol>
<li>Open a new email message</li>
<li>In the To field, type the first letter of the address you want to delete which will bring up all the AutoComplete entries under that letter</li>
<li>Using the <strong>Arrow Keys</strong> - very important to use the <strong>Arrow Keys on the Keyboard</strong> and not the mouse - arrow down to the entry that you want to delete</li>
<li>When you have the desired entry selected, press the <strong>Delete Key</strong></li>
</ol>
<p>If you want a tool to  manage/edit the AutoComplete list, I recommend checking out <a href="http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/outlook_nk2_autocomplete.html">NK2View</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/04/17/where-did-all-of-my-outlook-addressescontacts-go/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting off of a RBL</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/getting-off-of-a-rbl/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/getting-off-of-a-rbl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Tech Tips/Fixes</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/getting-off-of-a-rbl/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RBL (Real-time black lists) are very effective spam blocking mechanism.  However, like any spam prevention solution, it is far from perfect and legitimate email can be blocked as well.  An RBL is a list of IP addresses that an email server will not accept email from.  This is very effective as a spam blocking mechanism [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RBL (Real-time black lists) are very effective spam blocking mechanism.  However, like any spam prevention solution, it is far from perfect and legitimate email can be blocked as well.  An RBL is a list of IP addresses that an email server will not accept email from.  This is very effective as a spam blocking mechanism but can also be an issue for small businesses that have internal email servers since they often, through no fault of their own, are included on the RBL lists.  With the rise of spam originating from spyware and virus infected home PCs, RBLs almost always block email if it is sent directly from an IP address &#8220;known&#8221; to be a residential broadband range.  This is terrific concept except it is a huge under taking to maintain an accurate list of residential broadband IP addresses. RBLs are also know to add large ranges of IP addresses to their list if they detect spam activity from a single IP address within that range.  And unfortunately, the consensus attitude of the organizations that maintain most RBLs is &#8220;your were blocked for a reason, prove to us that you don&#8217;t send spam, we then might unblock you if we believe you.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t tell from my tone, I don&#8217;t agree with this approach for preventing spam. If you are in a position to decide to use a RBL to block spam, please thoroughly research the various solutions and use one that has a mechanism for legitimate users to easily get themselves removed from the list.  There are some lists that charge a fee to be removed from their list (highly suspect!).</p>
<p>Here are some online tools that will check to see if your server is listed on an RBL</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dnsstuff.com">http://www.dnsstuff.com</a><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.robtex.com/rbl">http://www.robtex.com/rbl</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a link to get removed from AT&#038;T&#8217;s RBL<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://worldnet.att.net/general-info/bls_info/block_inquiry.html">http://worldnet.att.net/general-info/bls_info/block_inquiry.html</a><br />
And you need it, here&#8217;s a phone number for AT&#038;T abuse department (to use if their online system doesn&#8217;t get you removed)</p>
<p>1-800-648-1626 option 1
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/getting-off-of-a-rbl/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why didn&#8217;t my email go though?</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/why-didnt-my-email-go-though/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/why-didnt-my-email-go-though/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Computer Questions</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/why-didnt-my-email-go-though/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most common questions that I get is about email &#8220;bounces&#8221; - why did this message get returned??  The funny part is, the more time I spend managing email servers, the more surprised I am that any email ever gets to the intended recipients! That said, we can usually figure out why [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most common questions that I get is about email &#8220;bounces&#8221; - why did this message get returned??  The funny part is, the more time I spend managing email servers, the more surprised I am that any email ever gets to the intended recipients! That said, we can usually figure out why the message didn&#8217;t make it through from the information in the bounce message.<br />
Here&#8217;s a few Non Delivery Reports (NDR) that different customers have received in the past couple of weeks</p>
<blockquote><p>goodemail.server.com #5.3.0 smtp;553 5.3.0 nlpi050,DNSBL:521< 65.6x.1xx.7x>_is_blocked.__See_http://www.att.net/bls_rbl/_for_information.></p>
<p>goodemail.server.com #5.5.0 smtp;591 recipient@idontknowtheirblockingemailtome.com your host [64.1xx.2xx.2xx] is blacklisted by feb.spamlab.com. No mail will be accepted></p>
<p>goodemail.server.com #5.5.0 smtp;550 lotsofemail@recipient.net&#8230;User account is overquota</p></blockquote>
<p>In many cases, unless you&#8217;re the email administrator, you may not be able to resolve the problem but you&#8217;ll never know unless you <em><strong>read the error message</strong></em>. While these error messages are not &#8220;user-friendly&#8221; as computer error messages go, they are far from cryptic.  The words &#8220;blocked&#8221; and &#8220;overquota&#8221; should give you a clue on what the problem is.  If an email server is blocking your email, you&#8217;ll need to get the administrator (either your admin or the recipients) involved.  However if you see an &#8220;overquota&#8221; or &#8220;mail box is over allowed size&#8221; message, you can often solve the problem by phoning the recipient and having them delete some of the email stored on their server!</p>
<p>Many times, there will be links listed in the error message that have more information about why the email didn&#8217;t go through.  In the first NDR listed above, the sender&#8217;s email server was listed on a &#8220;real-time blacklist&#8221; (RBL - a spam prevention mechanism - a topic for another post) and you can use the link to get your server removed from the list.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2008/03/19/why-didnt-my-email-go-though/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-home computer repair</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/05/in-home-computer-repair/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/05/in-home-computer-repair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Computer Questions</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/05/in-home-computer-repair/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about what people&#8217;s expectations of  the computer repair industry since watching a recent CBC &#8220;undercover investigation.&#8221;  The premise was a TV new producer had 10 different technicians from various chains come to a private home to diagnose and hopefully repair a broken computer and the visit of each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about what people&#8217;s expectations of  the computer repair industry since watching a recent CBC &#8220;<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/2007/10/03/geeks/">undercover investigation</a>.&#8221;  The premise was a TV new producer had 10 different technicians from various chains come to a private home to diagnose and hopefully repair a broken computer and the visit of each tech was filmed. Of course, the computer had been expertly sabotaged by some &#8220;highly respected&#8221; computer professionals and professors at the local university who proceeded to claim that the problem would cost $25 to fix.    Now the actions of one of the techs was outright deplorable, the other nine techs seemed to preform reasonable troubleshooting techniques.  While the reporter and her band of pros back at the university find fault in the performance of the 7 of the 10 techs, the majority of their critiques are based on their unrealistic expectations.</p>
<p>What you need to know before calling for in-home repair</p>
<ol>
<li>What is it going to cost? Does the provider charge a flat-fee or is it hourly?  Is there a charge for travel?  In the CBC investigation, the &#8220;customer&#8221; is continually shocked when presented with the bill.  The charges were between $60-$120 for labor which is well within the norm for this type of service. Ask about the charges BEFORE you schedule the service!</li>
<li>If your technician works for a company that sells hardware or software, they will most likely attempt to &#8220;up sell&#8221; a hardware or software upgrade.  This is how they make money.</li>
<li>At the same time, it may very well be cheaper to replace a computer than to pay an hourly fee + parts to repair your 6 year old PC.  I have made this recommendation several times with an clear conscience.  I&#8217;d rather a customer spend $500-600 dollars replacing an old machine than pay me for 2-3 hours (at $125/hr) to get another six months of use out of a machine.  In the long run it will be cheaper to replace than repair.</li>
<li>Think about why in-home repair costs what it does.  While most PC techs enjoy what they do, this is not charity and the businesses have to make money or they would not exist.  With travel time between sites and other overhead, from my experience it is difficult to have more than 3-4 visits in a single day.  Plus, when scheduling appointments, you have to give a cushion in case a job runs longer than anticipated.  How much would car mechanic charge for servicing your car in your garage?</li>
</ol>
<p>Most of the folks that are in the computer repair business are not out to gouge you but you need to have realistic expectations and ask questions before getting started!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/05/in-home-computer-repair/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Vista not gaining traction?</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/02/why-is-vista-not-gaining-traction/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/02/why-is-vista-not-gaining-traction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Computer Questions</category>
	<category>Reviews/Comparisons</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/02/why-is-vista-not-gaining-traction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a IT professional/computer geek, I have to stay current with the latest mainstream (meaning Microsoft) operating systems.  While I&#8217;ve had access to Vista since November of 2006, I&#8217;m still running XP and have absolutely zero motivation for &#8220;upgrading.&#8221;   And I&#8217;m not alone.  While XP to Vista upgrades are very rare due to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a IT professional/computer geek, I have to stay current with the latest mainstream (meaning Microsoft) operating systems.  While I&#8217;ve had access to Vista since November of 2006, I&#8217;m still running XP and have absolutely zero motivation for &#8220;upgrading.&#8221;   And I&#8217;m not alone.  While XP to Vista upgrades are very rare due to the Vista&#8217;s hefty hardware requirements,  business customers continue to order new computers, fully Vista compatible, with Windows XP preinstalled!  Just last week, due to high demand Microsoft announced OEMs would be allowed to sell computers preloaded with Windows XP until June 2008.  At that time Vista will have been out for over 18 months!</p>
<p>I  directly support nearly 200 desktop computers over a variety of industries and provide second-level support to organizations with another 500-600 computers.  Of all these computers, there are about 10 computers (7 are at one client) that have Vista installed on them.  All of these computers were purchased new with Vista preinstalled.  Since Vista was widely released in Febuary 2007, I have personally deployed somewhere in the neighbor 40 computers that were ordered with Windows XP despite the availability of Vista at the same price.</p>
<p>From my experience, here&#8217;s what is holding back the adoption of Vista:</p>
<ol>
<li>Despite the marketing campaign touting the WOW! there are no &#8220;killer&#8221; applications or features. What does Vista do that XP doesn&#8217;t do better or faster? There are a few &#8220;neat&#8221; features, the graphics are prettier but that is no motivation for a business to move to a new OS.</li>
<li>Compatibility issues.  Cisco, Intuit (Quickbooks), Palm, and Dell (printers) are just a few of the companies I&#8217;ve encountered over the past six months whose products have Vista compatibility issues.  I&#8217;ve had problems with Vista integrating with other Microsoft products (specifically Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007).  Due to the drastic changes in the security model employed in Vista, many applications and peripherals that worked in XP have to be modified to work in Vista (if they&#8217;ll work at all) since many of the behind the scenes stuff changed to increase &#8220;security.&#8221;  While Microsoft is to blame for the decades of lax security in previous versions of Windows that allowed developers to ignore security issues to be swept aside, these companies literally had years to prepare their products to work with Vista.</li>
<li>Performance.  On hardware that exceeds the recommended specs for running Vista, XP is faster.  I don&#8217;t have any fancy graphs or charts to prove this but it isn&#8217;t hard to see it.  Simple tasks such as <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931770/en-us">coping files</a> doesn&#8217;t work well.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2007/10/02/why-is-vista-not-gaining-traction/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I want to get a new PC, what should I get?</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/24/i-want-to-get-a-new-pc-what-should-i-get/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/24/i-want-to-get-a-new-pc-what-should-i-get/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Reviews/Comparisons</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/24/i-want-to-get-a-new-pc-what-should-i-get/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, WAIT!  If at all possible wait.  The next version of Windows, called &#8220;Vista&#8221; is just around the corner.  It is due to be released for business customers in November and for home users in January.  Vista is the replacement for Windows XP.  Now, I&#8217;m not saying if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, WAIT!  If at all possible wait.  The next version of Windows, called &#8220;Vista&#8221; is <a target="_blank" href="http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/bpi/index.php/2006/10/24/gartners-warning-over-windows-vista-release-date-should-have-included-a-mea-culpa/">just around the corner</a>.  It is due to be released for business customers in November and for home users in January.  Vista is the replacement for Windows XP.  Now, I&#8217;m not saying if you have a computer that is a year or two old that you should rush out and upgrade to Vista.  But if your PC is four plus years old and you are considering upgrading, my recommendation is to wait until Vista is released so you don&#8217;t have a computer that is outdated three months after you buy it.  One note to this, historically when there&#8217;s a new version of software just around the corner, many PC manufactures will give you a free upgrade to the new version  when it is released if you buy a PC in a specific time frame.  I would bet that some companys (Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc.) may do this around the holiday shopping season to entice folks to &#8220;buy now&#8221; rather than waiting for Vista.  Basically the machine you buy would come with XP and after it is released, you&#8217;d get a DVD (yes Vista comes on DVDs rather than CDs) with Vista that YOU get to install on your computer (which opens a entirely new can of worms).</p>
<p>If you must get a PC now make sure the manufacture certifies it as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/solutions/en/vista_capable?c=us&#038;l=en&#038;s=gen">&#8220;Vista Capable&#8221;</a> - this will ensure that the new computer meets a baseline set of requirements necessary for Vista to run.</p>
<p><em><strong>Update: </strong></em>Just stumbled on this Microsoft is offering an &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/expressupgrade.mspx">Express Upgrade</a>&#8221; option if you buy a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/solutions/en/vista_capable?c=us&#038;l=en&#038;s=gen">&#8220;Vista Capable&#8221;</a> PC between October 27, 2006 and March 17, 2005 <strong>BUT</strong> it will not be free!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/24/i-want-to-get-a-new-pc-what-should-i-get/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can you help me with my computer at home?</title>
		<link>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/19/can-you-help-me-with-my-computer-at-home/</link>
		<comments>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/19/can-you-help-me-with-my-computer-at-home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Computer Questions</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/19/can-you-help-me-with-my-computer-at-home/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I make my living working on computers.  Network Engineer or IT Consultant are the preferred titles but most of the time I&#8217;m referred to as the &#8220;computer guy.&#8221;  With over 11 years experience in the computer service industry and the last six years as a &#8216;consultant&#8217; you would think that dealling with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I make my living working on computers.  Network Engineer or IT Consultant are the preferred titles but most of the time I&#8217;m referred to as the &#8220;computer guy.&#8221;  With over 11 years experience in the computer service industry and the last six years as a &#8216;consultant&#8217; you would think that dealling with the average home PC or network would be no big deal, easy money.  Wrong.  In an office environment, the PCs are there for one reason, to help folks get their jobs done.  Home computers - especially those used by pesky teenagers -  are the sports utility vehicals - they need to do all sorts of homework, maintain countless playlists and then there are the games.  I cannot count how many times I&#8217;ve been called out to clean up a spyware and/or virus infected home PC running all sorts of P2P sharing apps.  Here are some tips for keeping those home PCs in a usable -</p>
<ul>
<li>Maintain seperate accounts for all users of the machine and restrict all account except for one administrator.  This allows you to control what software gets installed on the PC and helps keep spyware and viruses off it.</li>
<li>Make sure your antivirus/antispyware programs are running and up to date. If you don&#8217;t have antivirus or antispyware programs download the<a href="http://faqsoflife.net/the-google-pack/"> </a><a href="http://faqsoflife.net/the-google-pack/">Google Pack here</a> which includes a six-month free subscription to Norton Antivirus and a free personal edition of AdAware.</li>
<li>Keep computers out of your kids rooms and in a common area and keep an eye on what they are doing.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://faqsoflife.net/2006/10/19/can-you-help-me-with-my-computer-at-home/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
